An Example of School Business from Minnesota
School Solutions Met with Resistance by Democrats

Some politicians seem far more committed to pushing an expansive liberal vision for public education than to addressing the very real problems unfolding in our schools. Instead of focusing on academic decline, chronic absenteeism, or the growing gap between spending and student outcomes, they chase ideological initiatives that look bold on paper but leave parents and teachers without practical solutions. This approach treats schools as laboratories for social experimentation rather than places where children should master reading, math, and critical thinking.
That mindset often produces policies that sideline parents and expand bureaucracy. Rather than empowering families with transparency, choice, and accountability, these leaders double down on top‑down mandates, DEI‑driven programming, and curriculum changes that prioritize activism over academics. Meanwhile, classrooms struggle with discipline issues, teachers lack support, and students fall further behind. The disconnect grows wider as politicians insist their agenda is “progress,” even when the data shows otherwise.
When elected officials become more loyal to ideology than to student success, accountability disappears. Taxpayers watch budgets balloon while performance stagnates. Parents are told to stay quiet while decisions are made behind closed doors. A conservative perspective argues that schools deserve leadership grounded in common sense—leaders who put academics before politics, parents before bureaucracy, and measurable results before ideological ambition.
Latest Articles, Submissions & Community Highlights
Participating groups, neighborhood leaders, and citizen coalitions can share news, documents, or resources here.



