As Shaw Local recently reported, the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) is urging all adults to receive updated COVID-19 shots this fall. The messaging is familiar: protect yourself, protect others, trust the experts. But for many Kane County families, this recommendation raises deeper questions—not just about COVID, but about the entire vaccine landscape.


According to Stand for Health Freedom, the CDC now recommends up to 94 doses of vaccines for children before age 18. That’s a dramatic increase from just 24 doses in 1983. The escalation includes annual flu and COVID shots, multiple doses of HPV, meningococcal, and a growing list of early childhood injections—all before a child finishes high school.


The COVID Shot: A Case Study in Caution

Since its emergency authorization in 2020, the COVID vaccine has generated over 1 million adverse event reports—more than any other vaccine in history. Despite this, IDPH continues to promote it as safe and effective, with little public acknowledgment of long-term risks or individual vulnerabilities.

For Kane County residents who value transparency, this disconnect is troubling:

  • Why are adverse events minimized in public messaging?
  • Why is there no mention of risk factors like MTHFR mutations or detox pathway impairments?
  • Why are alternative perspectives excluded from official guidance?


The CDC Schedule: A Growing Burden

The CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule now includes:

  • COVID shots starting in pregnancy and infancy
  • Annual flu + COVID shots from age 2 onward
  • Multiple doses of DTaP, Hep B, MMR, Varicella, HPV, and more


This aggressive schedule is not law—but many states, including Illinois, use it to shape school mandates. And once adopted, opting out becomes a bureaucratic battle.



Kane County families are asking:

  • Where is the informed consent?
  • Why aren’t vaccine ingredients and side effects disclosed upfront?
  • How can parents make decisions when dissenting voices are silenced?


What’s in the Shots?

According to vaccine choice advocates, children may receive thousands of micrograms of substances like aluminum, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, and fetal cell lines. These ingredients are linked to neurotoxicity, immune disruption, and chronic inflammation—especially in children with compromised detox pathways.

The CDC and IDPH rarely address these concerns publicly. Instead, they rely on blanket assurances of safety, leaving parents to navigate the risks alone.


Kane County’s Path Forward

Local advocates are calling for:

  • Full ingredient disclosure for all vaccines
  • Public posting of exemption forms (a recent win for Kane County!)
  • Open forums for discussing vaccine risks and alternatives
  • Protection of parental rights in schools and healthcare settings


This isn’t about rejecting science—it’s about demanding better science. It’s about empowering families to make decisions based on their child’s unique biology, not one-size-fits-all mandates.


https://www.shawlocal.com/news/2025/09/24/covid-19-fall-shots-recommended-for-all-adults-idph/


HFI_childhood schedule_2025


Welcome to Vaccine Guide


From One Shot to Ninety-Four: Rethinking Vaccine Recommendations in Kane County

September 28, 2025

Share Article:

Follow Us:

Latest Articles, Submissions & Community Highlights

Participating groups, neighborhood leaders, and citizen coalitions can share news, documents, or resources here.

By Lisa Marie Farver November 10, 2025
Wheaton Teacher Accused of Sexual Assault/Abuse of former student
muffin flag money
November 8, 2025
A concerned citizen about SNAP in Kane County and the hypocrisy witnessed at the Northern Illinois Foodback
November 8, 2025
Background During the fall veto session of 2025, Illinois lawmakers passed House Bill 767 , a measure that gives the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) authority to issue state-specific vaccine guidelines . This move comes amid federal uncertainty, after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. rescinded emergency use authorizations for COVID-19 vaccines and dismissed the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. HB 767 empowers IDPH Director Sameer Vohra and the state’s Immunization Advisory Committee—composed of doctors, nurses, and public health professionals—to set Illinois’ own recommendations. It also requires state-regulated insurance plans to continue covering vaccines recommended by IDPH at no cost to patients, regardless of federal guidance. Key Provisions of HB 767 State Authority Over Vaccine Guidelines : IDPH can issue recommendations independent of federal agencies. Expanded Role for Advisory Committee : The committee can override the IDPH director’s recommendations with a two-thirds vote. Insurance Coverage Mandate : Vaccines recommended by IDPH must be covered by Illinois-regulated insurance plans at no cost. Transparency Requirement : IDPH must publish advisory committee guidance on its website. Impact on Health Freedom in Kane County For Kane County residents, HB 767 raises important questions about autonomy, transparency, and parental rights : Local Control vs. Federal Oversight The bill positions Illinois as a state willing to diverge from federal vaccine policy. While supporters argue this ensures science-based access, critics see it as politicized overreach that could limit individual choice. Insurance Coverage and Consent By mandating coverage of IDPH-recommended vaccines, HB 767 ties health freedom directly to state policy. Families in Kane County may face situations where insurance covers only state-approved vaccines, narrowing options for those who prefer alternative schedules or exemptions. Advisory Committee Power The committee’s ability to override the director offers a safeguard, but it also centralizes decision-making among a small group of professionals. Advocates for health freedom may question whether parental voices and community concerns are adequately represented. Transparency and Public Engagement The requirement to publish guidance online is a win for transparency. Kane County residents who value informed consent can use this provision to monitor state recommendations and push for clearer communication from the local health department. Political Context The bill passed on a party-line vote , with Democrats supporting it and Republicans opposing it. State Rep. Bob Morgan (D-Deerfield) framed the measure as a stand against “conspiracy theories,” while Rep. Bill Hauter (R-Morton), a physician, criticized it as politically motivated. For Kane County, this divide underscores the tension between public health policy and health freedom advocacy . Local residents who prioritize autonomy may see HB 767 as a reminder to stay vigilant and engaged in shaping county-level implementation. What Comes Next Governor’s Desk : HB 767 now awaits Gov. JB Pritzker’s signature. Local Advocacy : Kane County residents can monitor how the county health department interprets and applies IDPH guidelines. Community Action : This is a critical moment for parents, advocates, and health freedom supporters to demand transparency, ensure exemption forms remain accessible, and push for balanced representation in advisory processes.  Conclusion House Bill 767 reflects a broader struggle between centralized authority and individual choice. For Kane County, the bill’s passage highlights the need for continued advocacy to protect informed consent, parental rights, and equitable access to health information . Whether viewed as a safeguard against federal uncertainty or as a new layer of state control, HB 767 is a turning point in Illinois’ health policy—and Kane County residents have a vital role to play in shaping its impact. Illinois lawmakers approve state-specific vaccine guidelines, punt on gambling bill – Shaw Local