Yesterday, I attended an event in Geneva hosted by the Northern Illinois Food Bank. I’m still unclear who the intended audience was, but the speakers included Chairman Corinne Pierog, Representative Bill Foster, and Representative Lauren Underwood.

The event began with 15–20 minutes of carefully prepared remarks — all focused on blaming the Trump administration for “starving people.” The crowd, which seemed filled with clapping Karens, responded like trained seals every time the speakers used buzzwords like “cruelty” or “compassion.” The fake outrage and performative empathy were hard to stomach.

At one point, Chairman Pierog quoted something along the lines of “Hunger is the easiest way to control a population.” The irony couldn’t have been more obvious. It’s not Republicans who are holding up SNAP benefits — it’s Democrats, who refuse to negotiate unless they get exactly what they want. They call it “cruel” and “traumatic” to withhold food, yet that’s exactly what they’re doing. It’s projection at the highest level — accusing others of the very tactics they themselves use.

From their own words and data, one thing is clear: Democrats want to feed a man a fish so he can eat for a day, while Republicans want to teach a man to fish so he can eat for a lifetime. Democrats want control — one meal at a time. Republicans want independence — the dignity that comes from self-reliance.

And here’s the bottom line: If Democrats truly cared about feeding people, they have the full power to do it — but they don’t. Republicans have voted 15 times to reopen the government and restore SNAP benefits, while Democrats continue to block those funds from reaching the very people they claim to care about. The irony is off the charts.

No public comments were allowed, of course. This wasn’t an event for honest discussion — it was a one-sided lecture to a room full of useful idiots.

This is your local Democrat Party in Kane County — full of blame, empty compassion, and zero solutions.


Hypocrisy 101

November 8, 2025

Share Article:

Follow Us:

Latest Articles, Submissions & Community Highlights

Participating groups, neighborhood leaders, and citizen coalitions can share news, documents, or resources here.

By Lisa Marie Farver November 10, 2025
Wheaton Teacher Accused of Sexual Assault/Abuse of former student
November 8, 2025
Background During the fall veto session of 2025, Illinois lawmakers passed House Bill 767 , a measure that gives the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) authority to issue state-specific vaccine guidelines . This move comes amid federal uncertainty, after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. rescinded emergency use authorizations for COVID-19 vaccines and dismissed the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. HB 767 empowers IDPH Director Sameer Vohra and the state’s Immunization Advisory Committee—composed of doctors, nurses, and public health professionals—to set Illinois’ own recommendations. It also requires state-regulated insurance plans to continue covering vaccines recommended by IDPH at no cost to patients, regardless of federal guidance. Key Provisions of HB 767 State Authority Over Vaccine Guidelines : IDPH can issue recommendations independent of federal agencies. Expanded Role for Advisory Committee : The committee can override the IDPH director’s recommendations with a two-thirds vote. Insurance Coverage Mandate : Vaccines recommended by IDPH must be covered by Illinois-regulated insurance plans at no cost. Transparency Requirement : IDPH must publish advisory committee guidance on its website. Impact on Health Freedom in Kane County For Kane County residents, HB 767 raises important questions about autonomy, transparency, and parental rights : Local Control vs. Federal Oversight The bill positions Illinois as a state willing to diverge from federal vaccine policy. While supporters argue this ensures science-based access, critics see it as politicized overreach that could limit individual choice. Insurance Coverage and Consent By mandating coverage of IDPH-recommended vaccines, HB 767 ties health freedom directly to state policy. Families in Kane County may face situations where insurance covers only state-approved vaccines, narrowing options for those who prefer alternative schedules or exemptions. Advisory Committee Power The committee’s ability to override the director offers a safeguard, but it also centralizes decision-making among a small group of professionals. Advocates for health freedom may question whether parental voices and community concerns are adequately represented. Transparency and Public Engagement The requirement to publish guidance online is a win for transparency. Kane County residents who value informed consent can use this provision to monitor state recommendations and push for clearer communication from the local health department. Political Context The bill passed on a party-line vote , with Democrats supporting it and Republicans opposing it. State Rep. Bob Morgan (D-Deerfield) framed the measure as a stand against “conspiracy theories,” while Rep. Bill Hauter (R-Morton), a physician, criticized it as politically motivated. For Kane County, this divide underscores the tension between public health policy and health freedom advocacy . Local residents who prioritize autonomy may see HB 767 as a reminder to stay vigilant and engaged in shaping county-level implementation. What Comes Next Governor’s Desk : HB 767 now awaits Gov. JB Pritzker’s signature. Local Advocacy : Kane County residents can monitor how the county health department interprets and applies IDPH guidelines. Community Action : This is a critical moment for parents, advocates, and health freedom supporters to demand transparency, ensure exemption forms remain accessible, and push for balanced representation in advisory processes.  Conclusion House Bill 767 reflects a broader struggle between centralized authority and individual choice. For Kane County, the bill’s passage highlights the need for continued advocacy to protect informed consent, parental rights, and equitable access to health information . Whether viewed as a safeguard against federal uncertainty or as a new layer of state control, HB 767 is a turning point in Illinois’ health policy—and Kane County residents have a vital role to play in shaping its impact. Illinois lawmakers approve state-specific vaccine guidelines, punt on gambling bill – Shaw Local
November 6, 2025
This is a subtitle for your new post