11 Year old Students Given Sexual Orientation Survey

November 29, 2025

Share Article:

What Happened to the ABC's of Education?

A growing controversy in Oregon should serve as a wake-up call for families in Kane County. An Oregon father, Chuck Gonzales, recently discovered that his 11-year-old son was slated to take a state-issued survey probing children about their sexual orientation, gender identity, and whether they identify as transgender. The survey, issued by the Oregon Health Authority, included terms like “demigirl,” “genderfluid,” and “pansexual”—concepts far beyond the comprehension of most sixth graders. Gonzales described the questions as “weird and sick,” warning that bureaucrats are intruding into the private lives of children without parental consent.


For Kane County parents, the implications are clear: if such surveys can be quietly introduced in Oregon, they could just as easily appear in Illinois classrooms. Parents already frustrated with rising absenteeism and stagnant proficiency scores should be alarmed that education officials are diverting attention from academics to ideological experiments. Instead of focusing on reading, math, and preparing students for the future, schools risk confusing children with questions about sexuality before they are developmentally ready. This is not education—it is indoctrination, and it undermines the values families work hard to instill at home.


The broader issue is parental rights. Gonzales emphasized that most parents he spoke with had no idea the survey even existed, underscoring the lack of transparency. In Kane County, where taxpayers already struggle to hold districts accountable for spending and performance, the idea that schools could slip such material into classrooms without clear parental approval should raise red flags. Parents must remain vigilant, demand transparency, and insist that schools respect the boundaries of family values and faith.


Ultimately, this is about protecting children’s innocence and preserving local control over education. Kane County families should take Gonzales’ advice to heart: attend school board meetings, speak up, and refuse to let progressive agendas override parental authority. Our children are not test subjects for social experiments—they are gifts entrusted to parents, not the state. If Oregon’s example teaches us anything, it is that silence is not an option. Kane County parents must act now to safeguard their children’s education, values, and future.


/www.foxnews.com/media/oregon-father-outraged-after-discovering-11-year-old-son-slated-take-survey-about-sexual-orientation


https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/BIRTHDEATHCERTIFICATES/SURVEYS/Documents/SHS/2024/Questionnaires/6th_Grade-SHS_Questionnaire_2024.pdf

Follow Us:

Latest Articles, Submissions & Community Highlights

Participating groups, neighborhood leaders, and citizen coalitions can share news, documents, or resources here.

February 28, 2026
Hamilton’s fiscal principles show how strong credit, disciplined budgets, and local industry can protect Kane County families from rising taxes and economic instability
February 27, 2026
Illinois has just announced that IDPH is adopting the AAP’s 2026 immunization schedule as the state’s official guidance. That means Illinois is explicitly relying on the AAP’s authority, credibility, and safety claims. Because of that, the CHD lawsuit—if it moves forward—could have direct implications for Illinois policy, messaging, and public trust. Below are the key ways this could play out. 1. If the lawsuit exposes misleading safety claims, Illinois may face pressure to re-evaluate its adoption of the AAP schedule Illinois is using the AAP schedule as its official recommendation. If a federal court finds that the AAP: misrepresented safety data overstated testing concealed conflicts of interest or engaged in deceptive practices then IDPH’s reliance on the AAP could be called into question. That would open the door for: public hearings legislative scrutiny revisions to state guidance greater transparency requirements Illinois agencies may be forced to justify why they adopted a schedule tied to an organization under federal RICO litigation. 2. The lawsuit could strengthen arguments for parental rights and informed consent in Illinois If the case uncovers evidence that the AAP overstated safety or minimized risks, Illinois parents could use that to: challenge school exclusion policies push for broader medical exemptions demand independent safety reviews oppose automatic adoption of national schedules This would be especially relevant in counties like Kane , where parents are already organizing around transparency and choice. 3. IDPH may have to adjust its public messaging Right now, IDPH is promoting the AAP schedule as authoritative and evidence-based. If the lawsuit reveals: flawed science misleading statements or financial conflicts IDPH may need to revise its communications to avoid appearing to endorse an organization found to have misled the public. This could lead to: more cautious language disclaimers or a shift toward “shared decision-making” framing 4. Illinois legislators may introduce bills in response Depending on how the case unfolds, lawmakers could propose: greater oversight of IDPH’s adoption of national schedules requirements for independent state-level safety reviews expanded exemption rights limits on automatic alignment with AAP/CDC recommendation Illinois already has active debates around parental rights, school mandates, and public health authority. This lawsuit could accelerate those conversations. 5. The lawsuit could influence school policy and local health departments Schools and county health departments rely heavily on AAP and CDC guidance. If the AAP’s credibility is legally challenged: schools may hesitate to enforce strict compliance counties may adopt more flexible interpretations medical providers may feel more comfortable issuing exemptions This is especially relevant because Illinois already allows rabies exemptions for pets and religious exemptions for schoolchildren —precedents that show the state can accommodate individualized decisions. 6. Public trust in AAP-aligned guidance may weaken Even before any ruling, the lawsuit itself may: shift public perception increase skepticism of AAP-endorsed schedules reduce compliance with IDPH recommendations increase demand for transparency and alternatives Illinois parents who already feel unheard may become more vocal.  Bottom Line for Illinois Because IDPH has formally adopted the AAP’s 2026 schedule, any legal finding that the AAP misled the public would directly affect Illinois policy, messaging, and credibility . Even before the case concludes, the lawsuit will: intensify scrutiny empower parental-rights advocates and pressure IDPH to justify its reliance on AAP guidance Breaking: Children’s Health Defense Hits AAP With RICO Suit Over Fraudulent Vaccine Safety Claims • Children's Health Defense IDPH endorses the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) 2026 Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule for Illinois: ff3242bf-4c11-4123-a559-5212df28911e.pdf
February 27, 2026
: What History Shows and What Illinois Pet Owners Should Know