DOJ interested in cause of action against Illinois State Board of Elections?

August 8, 2025

Share Article:

Why Kane County voters should follow this case

A legal battle is underway in Illinois that underscores a growing concern among conservatives: the failure of state election officials to properly maintain voter registration rolls. As reported by The Center Square, former state Rep. Jeanne Ives and her organization, Breakthrough Ideas, along with Illinois Family Action, are pressing forward with a lawsuit filed in March 2024. The suit, backed by Judicial Watch attorneys, alleges that the Illinois State Board of Elections has neglected its duty under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) to remove ineligible voters. While two plaintiffs were dismissed from the case, Ives’ group retains standing, signaling that the issue is far from resolved.


Evidence of Negligence and Risk of Fraud?

Ives points to alarming data and personal examples that suggest Illinois’ voter rolls are riddled with inaccuracies. According to The Center Square, she cited instances where deceased individuals were recorded as having voted, a troubling sign of systemic failure. In one example, 23 counties with nearly one million registered voters removed only 100 names over two years—a number Ives called “absurdly small.” Such negligence not only wastes taxpayer money and time, but also opens the door to fraud, especially in a state with permanent vote-by-mail policies. Ballots sent to outdated or invalid addresses can easily be misused, undermining the integrity of elections.


Federal Scrutiny and National Implications?

The case has drawn attention from the U.S. Department of Justice, which filed a 15-page statement of interest on July 8. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon emphasized the importance of removing ineligible voters to ensure fair and accurate elections. The DOJ’s involvement signals that this issue could have national ramifications, potentially leading to further legal action. Ives told The Center Square that a settlement may be on the horizon, but regardless of the outcome, the case highlights a fundamental conservative principle: election integrity must be protected through rigorous enforcement of voter list maintenance. Without it, public trust in the democratic process is at risk.


Article as referenced in The Center Square

Follow Us:

Latest Articles, Submissions & Community Highlights

Participating groups, neighborhood leaders, and citizen coalitions can share news, documents, or resources here.

November 8, 2025
Background During the fall veto session of 2025, Illinois lawmakers passed House Bill 767 , a measure that gives the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) authority to issue state-specific vaccine guidelines . This move comes amid federal uncertainty, after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. rescinded emergency use authorizations for COVID-19 vaccines and dismissed the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. HB 767 empowers IDPH Director Sameer Vohra and the state’s Immunization Advisory Committee—composed of doctors, nurses, and public health professionals—to set Illinois’ own recommendations. It also requires state-regulated insurance plans to continue covering vaccines recommended by IDPH at no cost to patients, regardless of federal guidance. Key Provisions of HB 767 State Authority Over Vaccine Guidelines : IDPH can issue recommendations independent of federal agencies. Expanded Role for Advisory Committee : The committee can override the IDPH director’s recommendations with a two-thirds vote. Insurance Coverage Mandate : Vaccines recommended by IDPH must be covered by Illinois-regulated insurance plans at no cost. Transparency Requirement : IDPH must publish advisory committee guidance on its website. Impact on Health Freedom in Kane County For Kane County residents, HB 767 raises important questions about autonomy, transparency, and parental rights : Local Control vs. Federal Oversight The bill positions Illinois as a state willing to diverge from federal vaccine policy. While supporters argue this ensures science-based access, critics see it as politicized overreach that could limit individual choice. Insurance Coverage and Consent By mandating coverage of IDPH-recommended vaccines, HB 767 ties health freedom directly to state policy. Families in Kane County may face situations where insurance covers only state-approved vaccines, narrowing options for those who prefer alternative schedules or exemptions. Advisory Committee Power The committee’s ability to override the director offers a safeguard, but it also centralizes decision-making among a small group of professionals. Advocates for health freedom may question whether parental voices and community concerns are adequately represented. Transparency and Public Engagement The requirement to publish guidance online is a win for transparency. Kane County residents who value informed consent can use this provision to monitor state recommendations and push for clearer communication from the local health department. Political Context The bill passed on a party-line vote , with Democrats supporting it and Republicans opposing it. State Rep. Bob Morgan (D-Deerfield) framed the measure as a stand against “conspiracy theories,” while Rep. Bill Hauter (R-Morton), a physician, criticized it as politically motivated. For Kane County, this divide underscores the tension between public health policy and health freedom advocacy . Local residents who prioritize autonomy may see HB 767 as a reminder to stay vigilant and engaged in shaping county-level implementation. What Comes Next Governor’s Desk : HB 767 now awaits Gov. JB Pritzker’s signature. Local Advocacy : Kane County residents can monitor how the county health department interprets and applies IDPH guidelines. Community Action : This is a critical moment for parents, advocates, and health freedom supporters to demand transparency, ensure exemption forms remain accessible, and push for balanced representation in advisory processes.  Conclusion House Bill 767 reflects a broader struggle between centralized authority and individual choice. For Kane County, the bill’s passage highlights the need for continued advocacy to protect informed consent, parental rights, and equitable access to health information . Whether viewed as a safeguard against federal uncertainty or as a new layer of state control, HB 767 is a turning point in Illinois’ health policy—and Kane County residents have a vital role to play in shaping its impact. Illinois lawmakers approve state-specific vaccine guidelines, punt on gambling bill – Shaw Local
November 6, 2025
This is a subtitle for your new post
November 6, 2025
I n the early hours of October 31, 2025, while most Illinoisans were asleep, the state Senate passed SB 1950—a bill legalizing assisted suicide—by the narrowest possible margin. The vote took place at 3 a.m., following months of strategic maneuvering by supporters, including the controversial repurposing of a food-safety bill in the House to bypass scrutiny. What SB 1950 Would Do If signed into law by Governor JB Pritzker, SB 1950 would:  Legalize physician-assisted suicide for qualifying patients  Make Illinois the first Midwest state to adopt such legislation  Position suicide as a “medical option” under certain conditions Who’s Most Affected? Critics warn the bill puts vulnerable populations at risk:  Elderly individuals who may feel pressured to end their lives  Disabled residents who fear being seen as burdens  People with depression or chronic illness who may be offered death instead of care Kane County Voices of Concern Local advocates for life and disability rights are sounding the alarm:  Informed consent: Will patients fully understand their options—or feel coerced?  Mental health: Are suicidal individuals being offered death instead of support?  Medical ethics: Will doctors face pressure to comply with assisted suicide requests? Faith leaders and family advocates in Kane County are urging residents to contact Governor Pritzker and ask for a veto. Pastor Calvin Lindstrom of Arlington Heights called the bill “a legal abandonment of the desperate,” warning that it dresses suicide as dignity while absolving the state of its duty to protect life. What You Can Do Kane County residents concerned about SB 1950 can:  Call or email Governor Pritzker’s office to urge a veto  Share information with neighbors and church communities  Speak out at local forums and county meetings  Support organizations defending life and disability rights Why This Matters Locally This bill isn’t just about state policy—it’s about the values we uphold in our homes, hospitals, and communities. Kane County families, caregivers, and medical professionals must now grapple with the ethical and emotional consequences of a law that redefines how we treat suffering. Illinois Senate Passes Suicide Bill at 3 AM