Blackjacks Strip Club is at it again.  Upset with the decision earlier this year to deny Blackjack's a liquor license, it seems that they have strategically waited for Dale Berman's illness to force a revote.  Blackjacks, was denied their liquor license request on June 25, 2025 video from board's denial of Blackjack's request.


Madam Chair Pierog needs to recuse herself because of her acceptance of monies from the owners of Blackjacks.  This means that the remaining liquor control board members must vote. 


Why would Blackjack's revisit this issue unless they had a reason.  Purportedly, Blackjacks filed a legal action against the commission because Mr. Berman, instead of just voting no, explained his moral reasoning for voting no.  If Mr. Berman changes his vote, then it's reasonable to believe that someone "got to" Berman and told him it was in his "best interests to reconsider his vote."  Sounds like "an offer he can't refuse."


Or perhaps this is strategic revote since they know that board member Dale Berman is currently ill.  Can Mr. Berman zoom in?  Is he lucid?   Is it an illness that would prohibit his ability to participate?   


In an industry known for taking advantage of women for money, it appears that money remains the number one objective.  If the board members ignores the fact that one of its own members are ill, or if the board wanted Mr. Berman to "reconsider" his decision as well as his, much can be implied.   Any change by Berman reeks of nefariousness and extreme pressure by Blackjacks, their attorneys, and even Pierog as a recipient of her campaign money she received.  Just because she may once again recuse herself doesn't mean that she's not flexing behind the scenes.


If you want to go to the meeting, it is Thursday, August 14th, at 11:30 am at 719 S. Batavia Ave., Bldg. A, Geneva, IL 60134 - Auditorium.  If you wish to speak, please click here to register.  And here is a copy of the agenda.


In the interim, a vote for no was given.  The people of Kane County had a victory.  But it appears that Madam Pierog, is working a back room deal in order to get her donors back to the table.  In the interim, get in contact with the members of the liquor board who can vote. 


1) Dale Berman who voted against granting the license & is purportedly ill - dberman@kanecoboard.org

2) Chris Kios who voted to allow booze in Blackjacks - ckious@kanecoboard.org and call him at 630-248-1369

3)  Mike Linder who voted to allow booze in Blackjacks - mlinder@kanecoboard.org and 630-443-1213

4)  Cliff Surges - who voted against granting the license - csurges@kanecoboard.org

Blackjacks Revisits Liquor commission - An attack on Kane Residents

August 10, 2025

Share Article:

Follow Us:

Latest Articles, Submissions & Community Highlights

Participating groups, neighborhood leaders, and citizen coalitions can share news, documents, or resources here.

By Lisa Marie Farver November 10, 2025
Wheaton Teacher Accused of Sexual Assault/Abuse of former student
muffin flag money
November 8, 2025
A concerned citizen about SNAP in Kane County and the hypocrisy witnessed at the Northern Illinois Foodback
November 8, 2025
Background During the fall veto session of 2025, Illinois lawmakers passed House Bill 767 , a measure that gives the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) authority to issue state-specific vaccine guidelines . This move comes amid federal uncertainty, after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. rescinded emergency use authorizations for COVID-19 vaccines and dismissed the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. HB 767 empowers IDPH Director Sameer Vohra and the state’s Immunization Advisory Committee—composed of doctors, nurses, and public health professionals—to set Illinois’ own recommendations. It also requires state-regulated insurance plans to continue covering vaccines recommended by IDPH at no cost to patients, regardless of federal guidance. Key Provisions of HB 767 State Authority Over Vaccine Guidelines : IDPH can issue recommendations independent of federal agencies. Expanded Role for Advisory Committee : The committee can override the IDPH director’s recommendations with a two-thirds vote. Insurance Coverage Mandate : Vaccines recommended by IDPH must be covered by Illinois-regulated insurance plans at no cost. Transparency Requirement : IDPH must publish advisory committee guidance on its website. Impact on Health Freedom in Kane County For Kane County residents, HB 767 raises important questions about autonomy, transparency, and parental rights : Local Control vs. Federal Oversight The bill positions Illinois as a state willing to diverge from federal vaccine policy. While supporters argue this ensures science-based access, critics see it as politicized overreach that could limit individual choice. Insurance Coverage and Consent By mandating coverage of IDPH-recommended vaccines, HB 767 ties health freedom directly to state policy. Families in Kane County may face situations where insurance covers only state-approved vaccines, narrowing options for those who prefer alternative schedules or exemptions. Advisory Committee Power The committee’s ability to override the director offers a safeguard, but it also centralizes decision-making among a small group of professionals. Advocates for health freedom may question whether parental voices and community concerns are adequately represented. Transparency and Public Engagement The requirement to publish guidance online is a win for transparency. Kane County residents who value informed consent can use this provision to monitor state recommendations and push for clearer communication from the local health department. Political Context The bill passed on a party-line vote , with Democrats supporting it and Republicans opposing it. State Rep. Bob Morgan (D-Deerfield) framed the measure as a stand against “conspiracy theories,” while Rep. Bill Hauter (R-Morton), a physician, criticized it as politically motivated. For Kane County, this divide underscores the tension between public health policy and health freedom advocacy . Local residents who prioritize autonomy may see HB 767 as a reminder to stay vigilant and engaged in shaping county-level implementation. What Comes Next Governor’s Desk : HB 767 now awaits Gov. JB Pritzker’s signature. Local Advocacy : Kane County residents can monitor how the county health department interprets and applies IDPH guidelines. Community Action : This is a critical moment for parents, advocates, and health freedom supporters to demand transparency, ensure exemption forms remain accessible, and push for balanced representation in advisory processes.  Conclusion House Bill 767 reflects a broader struggle between centralized authority and individual choice. For Kane County, the bill’s passage highlights the need for continued advocacy to protect informed consent, parental rights, and equitable access to health information . Whether viewed as a safeguard against federal uncertainty or as a new layer of state control, HB 767 is a turning point in Illinois’ health policy—and Kane County residents have a vital role to play in shaping its impact. Illinois lawmakers approve state-specific vaccine guidelines, punt on gambling bill – Shaw Local