Kane Parents should be very concerned

August 12, 2025

Share Article:

pritzker's attack on kane families and what you can do

Parental Rights Undermined by Illinois Mental Health Law

Governor JB Pritzker has signed SB1560 legislation mandating universal mental health screenings for Illinois students in grades 3 through 12, beginning in the 2027–2028 school year. While the bill is framed as a proactive measure to identify early signs of anxiety, depression, or trauma, critics argue that this initiative crosses a boundary between education and personal health—territory traditionally reserved for families and licensed professionals.

🔍 Key Points of Contention

·        Invasive Measures: The screenings will be self-assessed via tablets or forms, raising concerns about the accuracy, privacy, and psychological impact of such evaluations on children.

·        Parental Opt-Out: Although parents can opt their children out, the default assumption is participation—placing the burden on families to actively reject a state-imposed health measure.

·        Blurred Lines: Schools are being tasked with implementing mental health protocols, a role that arguably belongs to healthcare providers, not educators.

·        Precedent Setting: Illinois becomes the first state to mandate such screenings, prompting fears of a slippery slope toward more intrusive policies under the guise of student welfare.


Parental Opt-Out: A Superficial Safeguard

While the law technically allows parents to opt their children out of annual mental health screenings, this provision raises serious concerns about informed consent, transparency, and the shifting balance of authority between families and the state.

🔍 Key Issues with the Opt-Out Model

  • Default Participation: The screenings are automatically administered unless a parent actively opts out. This flips the traditional model of consent—where participation requires explicit approval—into one of presumed compliance. It places the burden on families to monitor and reject a government-mandated health measure embedded in the school system.
  • Lack of Clarity and Notification: The law does not specify how schools must inform parents about the screenings or the opt-out process. Without standardized, timely, and transparent communication, many parents may be unaware that their child is being screened or that they have the right to decline.
  • Social Pressure and Stigma: Opting out could subject students or families to subtle social consequences. In a school environment where participation is the norm, those who decline may be viewed as non-cooperative or negligent, especially if educators or peers perceive the screenings as beneficial.
  • Erosion of Parental Authority: By embedding health screenings into the educational framework, the state bypasses traditional healthcare channels and parental discretion. This sets a precedent for schools to act as proxies for public health agencies, potentially expanding their role into areas that should remain under family and medical purview.
  • Ambiguity Around Data Use: Even if a student participates, questions remain about how screening data will be stored, shared, and used. Parents opting out may be doing so not just to avoid the screening itself, but to protect their child’s sensitive information from being collected in a school setting.

Philosophical Concerns

This legislation reflects a growing trend of schools being used as platforms for state-driven health initiatives, potentially undermining parental authority and individual autonomy. Critics question whether schools should be involved in mental health detection at all, especially when the screenings are not diagnostic and may lead to unnecessary labeling or intervention.

Illinois school opt out form: https://pacificjustice.org/resources/for-parents/public-school-opt-out-forms/public-school-opt-out-forms-content/

Follow Us:

Latest Articles, Submissions & Community Highlights

Participating groups, neighborhood leaders, and citizen coalitions can share news, documents, or resources here.

September 28, 2025
As Shaw Local recently reported, the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) is urging all adults to receive updated COVID-19 shots this fall. The messaging is familiar: protect yourself, protect others, trust the experts. But for many Kane County families, this recommendation raises deeper questions—not just about COVID, but about the entire vaccine landscape. According to Stand for Health Freedom, the CDC now recommends up to 94 doses of vaccines for children before age 18. That’s a dramatic increase from just 24 doses in 1983. The escalation includes annual flu and COVID shots, multiple doses of HPV, meningococcal, and a growing list of early childhood injections—all before a child finishes high school. The COVID Shot: A Case Study in Caution Since its emergency authorization in 2020, the COVID vaccine has generated over 1 million adverse event reports—more than any other vaccine in history. Despite this, IDPH continues to promote it as safe and effective, with little public acknowledgment of long-term risks or individual vulnerabilities. For Kane County residents who value transparency, this disconnect is troubling: Why are adverse events minimized in public messaging? Why is there no mention of risk factors like MTHFR mutations or detox pathway impairments? Why are alternative perspectives excluded from official guidance? The CDC Schedule: A Growing Burden The CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule now includes: COVID shots starting in pregnancy and infancy Annual flu + COVID shots from age 2 onward Multiple doses of DTaP, Hep B, MMR, Varicella, HPV, and more This aggressive schedule is not law—but many states, including Illinois, use it to shape school mandates. And once adopted, opting out becomes a bureaucratic battle.  Kane County families are asking: Where is the informed consent? Why aren’t vaccine ingredients and side effects disclosed upfront? How can parents make decisions when dissenting voices are silenced? What’s in the Shots? According to vaccine choice advocates, children may receive thousands of micrograms of substances like aluminum, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, and fetal cell lines. These ingredients are linked to neurotoxicity, immune disruption, and chronic inflammation—especially in children with compromised detox pathways. The CDC and IDPH rarely address these concerns publicly. Instead, they rely on blanket assurances of safety, leaving parents to navigate the risks alone. Kane County’s Path Forward Local advocates are calling for: Full ingredient disclosure for all vaccines Public posting of exemption forms (a recent win for Kane County!) Open forums for discussing vaccine risks and alternatives Protection of parental rights in schools and healthcare settings This isn’t about rejecting science—it’s about demanding better science. It’s about empowering families to make decisions based on their child’s unique biology, not one-size-fits-all mandates. https://www.shawlocal.com/news/2025/09/24/covid-19-fall-shots-recommended-for-all-adults-idph/ HFI_childhood schedule_2025 Welcome to Vaccine Guide
September 27, 2025
In Kane County, where informed consent and parental autonomy are increasingly under the spotlight, a growing number of residents are raising concerns about a common household medication: Tylenol. The active ingredient, acetaminophen (also known as paracetamol), is found in over 600 products and widely used to treat pain and fever. But emerging research and advocacy groups like Learn The Risk are sounding the alarm about its potential impact on developing brains. The Biochemistry Behind the Concern Acetaminophen depletes glutathione—a master antioxidant and detoxifier critical for protecting the brain from oxidative stress and environmental toxins. When glutathione levels drop, especially during pregnancy or early childhood, the brain becomes more vulnerable to injury. This isn’t speculation—it’s biochemistry. For families in Kane County, this raises urgent questions: Are we fully informed about the risks of medications we routinely give our children? Why aren’t these biochemical effects more widely discussed in pediatric care? Genetics, Detox Pathways, and Inherited Vulnerabilities Many children (and parents) carry MTHFR gene mutations, which impair detoxification and folate processing. When these genetic vulnerabilities combine with acetaminophen use, vaccine exposures, and environmental toxins, the body’s defenses can collapse—creating what some call a “perfect storm” for neurological injury. This isn’t about blaming parents. It’s about empowering them with knowledge that’s often withheld or dismissed. Autism, Labels, and the Reality of Severe Injury While autism is frequently framed as a genetic or behavioral variation, families in Kane County know the difference between quirky traits and debilitating conditions. Severe cases—marked by self-harm, sensory overwhelm, and inability to function in public—are not explained away by “better awareness.” They demand deeper investigation into environmental and pharmaceutical contributors. What Kane County Parents Can Do Ask questions : Don’t rely solely on polished experts or government talking points. Seek out independent research and functional medicine perspectives. Explore alternatives : Natural pain relief options may offer safer choices for families with detox vulnerabilities. Advocate for transparency : Push local health departments and pediatric practices to disclose risks and offer informed consent materials. Get tested : Consider MTHFR and detox pathway testing to understand your family’s unique vulnerabilities. Join the Movement Kane County residents are already leading the charge for health transparency—whether it’s securing access to religious exemption forms or challenging overreach in schools. This conversation about acetaminophen is part of a broader push to protect children from preventable harm. Let’s keep asking hard questions. Let’s keep demanding better. And let’s make sure every parent in Kane County has the tools to make truly informed decisions. Learn The Risk - 👉 The culprit in Tylenol is acetaminophen... | Facebook
By Rose McNaul September 19, 2025
A Tribute to His legacy: by Rose McNaul