Kane Parents should be very concerned

August 12, 2025

Share Article:

pritzker's attack on kane families and what you can do

Parental Rights Undermined by Illinois Mental Health Law

Governor JB Pritzker has signed SB1560 legislation mandating universal mental health screenings for Illinois students in grades 3 through 12, beginning in the 2027–2028 school year. While the bill is framed as a proactive measure to identify early signs of anxiety, depression, or trauma, critics argue that this initiative crosses a boundary between education and personal health—territory traditionally reserved for families and licensed professionals.

🔍 Key Points of Contention

·        Invasive Measures: The screenings will be self-assessed via tablets or forms, raising concerns about the accuracy, privacy, and psychological impact of such evaluations on children.

·        Parental Opt-Out: Although parents can opt their children out, the default assumption is participation—placing the burden on families to actively reject a state-imposed health measure.

·        Blurred Lines: Schools are being tasked with implementing mental health protocols, a role that arguably belongs to healthcare providers, not educators.

·        Precedent Setting: Illinois becomes the first state to mandate such screenings, prompting fears of a slippery slope toward more intrusive policies under the guise of student welfare.


Parental Opt-Out: A Superficial Safeguard

While the law technically allows parents to opt their children out of annual mental health screenings, this provision raises serious concerns about informed consent, transparency, and the shifting balance of authority between families and the state.

🔍 Key Issues with the Opt-Out Model

  • Default Participation: The screenings are automatically administered unless a parent actively opts out. This flips the traditional model of consent—where participation requires explicit approval—into one of presumed compliance. It places the burden on families to monitor and reject a government-mandated health measure embedded in the school system.
  • Lack of Clarity and Notification: The law does not specify how schools must inform parents about the screenings or the opt-out process. Without standardized, timely, and transparent communication, many parents may be unaware that their child is being screened or that they have the right to decline.
  • Social Pressure and Stigma: Opting out could subject students or families to subtle social consequences. In a school environment where participation is the norm, those who decline may be viewed as non-cooperative or negligent, especially if educators or peers perceive the screenings as beneficial.
  • Erosion of Parental Authority: By embedding health screenings into the educational framework, the state bypasses traditional healthcare channels and parental discretion. This sets a precedent for schools to act as proxies for public health agencies, potentially expanding their role into areas that should remain under family and medical purview.
  • Ambiguity Around Data Use: Even if a student participates, questions remain about how screening data will be stored, shared, and used. Parents opting out may be doing so not just to avoid the screening itself, but to protect their child’s sensitive information from being collected in a school setting.

Philosophical Concerns

This legislation reflects a growing trend of schools being used as platforms for state-driven health initiatives, potentially undermining parental authority and individual autonomy. Critics question whether schools should be involved in mental health detection at all, especially when the screenings are not diagnostic and may lead to unnecessary labeling or intervention.

Illinois school opt out form: https://pacificjustice.org/resources/for-parents/public-school-opt-out-forms/public-school-opt-out-forms-content/

< Older Post

 Newer Post >

Follow Us:

Latest Articles, Submissions & Community Highlights

Participating groups, neighborhood leaders, and citizen coalitions can share news, documents, or resources here.

I can't believe it's not butter

August 13, 2025
bill gates & local kane county company charges towards locally made fake butter
Neon sign for

Blackjacks Revisits Liquor commission - An attack on Kane Residents

August 10, 2025
Blackjacks Strip Club is at it again. Upset with the decision earlier this year to deny Blackjack's a liquor license, it seems that they have strategically waited for Dale Berman's illness to force a revote. Blackjacks, was denied their liquor license request on June 25, 2025 video from board's denial of Blackjack's request . Madam Chair Pierog needs to recuse herself because of her acceptance of monies from the owners of Blackjacks. This means that the remaining liquor control board members must vote. Why would Blackjack's revisit this issue unless they had a reason. Purportedly, Blackjacks filed a legal action against the commission because Mr. Berman, instead of just voting no, explained his moral reasoning for voting no. If Mr. Berman changes his vote, then it's reasonable to believe that someone "got to" Berman and told him it was in his "best interests to reconsider his vote." Sounds like "an offer he can't refuse." Or perhaps this is strategic revote since they know that board member Dale Berman is currently ill. Can Mr. Berman zoom in? Is he lucid? Is it an illness that would prohibit his ability to participate? In an industry known for taking advantage of women for money, it appears that money remains the number one objective. If the board members ignores the fact that one of its own members are ill, or if the board wanted Mr. Berman to "reconsider" his decision as well as his, much can be implied. Any change by Berman reeks of nefariousness and extreme pressure by Blackjacks, their attorneys, and even Pierog as a recipient of her campaign money she received. Just because she may once again recuse herself doesn't mean that she's not flexing behind the scenes. If you want to go to the meeting, it is Thursday, August 14th, at 11:30 am at 719 S. Batavia Ave., Bldg. A, Geneva, IL 60134 - Auditorium. If you wish to speak, please click here to register . And here is a copy of the agenda. In the interim, a vote for no was given. The people of Kane County had a victory. But it appears that Madam Pierog, is working a back room deal in order to get her donors back to the table. In the interim, get in contact with the members of the liquor board who can vote. 1) Dale Berman who voted against granting the license & is purportedly ill - dberman@kanecoboard.org 2) Chris Kios who voted to allow booze in Blackjacks - ckious@kanecoboard.org and call him at 630-248-1369 3) Mike Linder who voted to allow booze in Blackjacks - mlinder@kanecoboard.org and 630-443-1213 4) Cliff Surges - who voted against granting the license - csurges@kanecoboard.org
Roll of

DOJ interested in cause of action against Illinois State Board of Elections?

August 8, 2025
Why Kane County voters should follow this case